Friday, April 26, 2024
Home Authors Posts by Joe Russo

Joe Russo

19 POSTS 0 COMMENTS
Joe Russo is an underwriter and account executive at Petersen International Underwriters. With over 15 years in the financial services industry, Russo is a “specialty market” life and disability insurance expert. He is also the editor-in-chief of Petersen International’s weekly publication The Communicator. Russo can be reached at Petersen International Underwriters, 23929 Valencia Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Valencia, CA 91355. Telephone: 800-345-8816. Email: joe@piu.org.

Insights Into Disability Financial Underwriting

0

No matter how long you have made a living in the financial services industry, you are at the very least somewhat aware of the amount of time and usual care that goes into the underwriting of insurance policies by carriers. Insurance companies employ learned, specialized professionals to analyze risk and weigh the financial gain of making a profit by collecting premiums versus providing financial protection products to consumers. Underwriting is defined as accepting liability under the form of an insurance policy, guaranteeing payment of benefits in case of loss or damage. In the eyes of the insurer, there is a delicate balance of indemnifying risk and paying out monetary claims while still making money.

Underwriting methodology is, dependent upon the type of insurance, often broken down into two categories—medical underwriting and financial underwriting. As medical underwriting is a complicated subject unto its own, it quite rightly deserves a separate discussion at a later time. Here we will focus on the other imperative aspect of insurance risk analysis—financial underwriting.

Financial underwriting involves the evaluation of insurance policy applicants and classifying them so appropriate rates may be charged and appropriate benefit levels may be provided. It further involves assessing whether a proposed sum insured and product limitations are reasonable when considering the potential financial loss to a client.

Many of you sell life insurance and are probably very familiar with the underwriting standards and financial guidelines set forth by your usual life carriers. Benefit limitations are generally based upon calculations of multiples of income, varying proportions of net worth or even estate tax liability snapshots of your prospective clientele. In general, the equations measuring the financial underwriting of life insurance tend to remain straightforward and less complex than other insurances. Disability insurance financial underwriting, on the other hand, tends to be less elementary, requiring extra diligence by both insurance company underwriters and the consumer’s representative insurance agent.

Disability financial underwriters are commonly certified public accountants or at the very least have strong backgrounds in accounting on top of professional financial degrees. Expertise in the position doesn’t happen overnight and it can take years to develop the craft as they analyze risk after risk, case after case, while heading toward a common goal of reasonable financial protection of the carrier while providing marketable and affordable income-protection benefit programs to consumers.

Financial underwriting methodologies can differ among disability product lines. Regarding personal disability insurance, underwriters tend to maintain the insured person as their focus in terms of fiduciary needs and over-insurance concerns. Requested benefit amounts are commonly reduced to save the client from overpaying for benefit levels that wouldn’t come to fruition during a claim because of the client’s relatively lower annual income. However, reconsideration of benefits are available once an applicant’s financial situation has improved. Over-insurance is a main concern of dutiful financial underwriters while underinsurance should remain a rightful concern of insurance advisors.

The first step in consideration of the financial insurability of an applicant is the thorough review of the application itself and the financial summary provided by the applicant. In some cases additional information and proof of insurability is needed—like two consecutive years of recent individual federal and state income tax returns. Benefit eligibility is measured upon a percentage of net earned non-passive income set by the insurance company. Domestic DI carriers often penalize applicants for having passive “unearned” income such as rental property or investment proceeds. Specialty-market carriers like Lloyd’s of London and other Surplus Lines insurers often times ignore passive income without reduction of available benefits. If the applicant’s current work year is showing more positive signs in terms of higher income levels compared to previous tax years, financial underwriters will review employment pay stubs, fully-executed employment agreements, K-1 earnings and sometimes corporate financial statements in the sincere attempt to prove financial insurability among clients whose taxable earned incomes aren’t measuring up to their requested benefit amounts.

There are differing ideologies when it comes to domestic carrier underwriters and specialty-market underwriters regarding their respective maximum benefit limitations and participation caps. Domestic carriers stick to strict benefit participation levels of 50 to 60 percent of income with usual monthly benefit caps anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000, dependent upon on the applicant’s age, occupation class and income level. Specialty-market carriers lean more liberally and flexibly in their offerings, allowing participation of benefit levels up to 65 to 75 percent of income without monthly benefit caps often regardless of age, occupation or income level.

Underwriters are regularly presented with unique cases and situations which raise concern and require a more investigative approach. An applicant’s earnings history can show significant income fluctuations and volatility in employment confidence which will require underwriters to analyze the occupation, industry, and economic trends that may have impacted past earnings and contribute to future income streams. Business owners showing unwavering earnings in industries ripe with historical earnings fluctuations will often require additional financial documentation to support the earnings stated on the application. Spousal business partnerships may require additional detail since income splits can be convoluted and unclear as to how the earnings are truly being generated. Newly self-employed individuals with no previous earnings history often require a more cautious approach since earnings trends are not established and accounting records may not be readily available. Seasonal employment opportunities can be challenging, as well as the income variations and earnings advancements seen with occupations stemming from the entertainment, arts and literature industries.

Circumstances may arise in the underwriting process that commonly call for a reduction of available benefit or even the ultimate declination of coverage. Applicants who report gross revenues instead of net income are problematic as well as those that include passive real estate income in their earnings when they are not considered real estate professionals. Another “red flag” is the inclusion of distributions from an S-Corp or draws from a partnership in personal income instead of appropriate non-passive taxable earnings as reported on a K-1 schedule for a given tax year. Also, applicants commonly leave out details of in-force disability insurance policies through other carriers as well as failing to indicate whether said coverage is employer-paid and/or taxable to the insured person. On the contrary, underwriters will seek to advise applicants if their eligibility for higher benefits exceeds the benefit level for which they applied.

The disability financial underwriting of business cases is similar to that of personal DI, but the fiduciary analysis becomes more focused on the corporate entity rather than proposed insured person’s personal finances. And again, over-insurance remains a primary concern, but underwriters assume a business owner knows his or her business needs better than the insurance company. Underwriters employ supplemental questionnaires to evaluate risk for the underwriting of key person, business overhead and buy/sell insurance policies. The financial underwriting is fairly straightforward as opposed to underwriting personal benefits, yet all business disability cases still require substantial in-depth review.

Key person DI underwriting uses a simple multiple of personal annual income of the proposed insured key person as a beginning measurement for financial justification of the benefit. Underwriters will take other factors into consideration in their analysis such as potential fiduciary loss to the company, potential loss of current and future accounts, corporate ownership value of the insured person as well as perceived value of the key person to the company.

Business overhead expense underwriting requires the applicant to provide a detailed listing of average monthly tax-deductible expenses including mortgage interest payments, utility bills, insurance premiums, accounting services, maintenance costs and certain employee salary expenses.

Buy/sell DI underwriting requires an accurate outline of corporate structure as well as an executed buy/sell agreement and corporate or partnership tax returns.

As an insurance professional, your role is absolutely important in the support of attaining disability insurance for your clientele. You can read between the lines and address certain criteria as to what attributes disability underwriters will favor and fault in a prospective risk. You can also help streamline and accelerate the financial review processing of your client’s file by providing missing information that was mistakenly not disclosed on the application. Be proactive in assisting your clients by providing tax returns, year-to-date pay stubs and any details pertaining to changes in employment or income fluctuations. Providing these items can simply help provide a sense of goodwill with underwriters, demonstrating the client is forthcoming with their overall financial situation, and will most likely help in the ultimate approval of the risk and the issuance of the insurance policy in a timely manner.

The financial underwriting of personal and business disability insurance policies isn’t always black and white and is much more than just numbers, dollars and cents. Underwriters will look at all the provided figures and data, but additionally take the inherent value of the prospective client into consideration, in hopes of providing appropriate insurance levels to paying consumers while still maintaining a profitable bottom line for the insurance company.

Advanced Income Replacement Strategies

0

Comprehensive disability insurance isn’t usually the first product on the minds of U.S. insurance advisors, nor is it on the minds of their clients. The average American rarely inquires about most aspects of insurance, but when they do it usually entails coverage types more requisite to government mandates, like medical or auto insurance, or preconceived notions of coverage for definite eventualities like life insurance. We are now required to have health and auto insurance, and we all know that someday we will die, but most of us never think we will be so sick or injured that we can’t work and earn a living.

Americans, regardless of age or gender, have a generalized “Superman” complex-not believing they are susceptible to accident or illness and eventual temporary or permanent disablement. But the statistical data relays a vivid picture much to the contrary. According to the Council for Disability Awareness, more than one in four 20-year-olds can expect to be out of work for at least a year due to disablement before they reach retirement age. And 5.6 percent of working Americans suffer a short-term disability every year. In spite of this alarming information, 51 million working adults in this country are living without some form of disability insurance other than miniscule Social Security benefits. Furthermore, most U.S. households lack adequate savings, liquid assets or balanced retirement vehicles in case of long-term disablement. Only 48 percent of adults report that they have saved enough to cover three months of living expenses if they encountered a stoppage of income.

Income is our greatest asset. Without a steady inflow of personal capital, we as Americans cannot expect to flourish let alone maintain a life of avid consumerism in a country where we must pay to survive. Food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, schooling, transportation, insurance, entertainment-it all costs money. Without an income the dominoes fall, life turns to chaos, and financial ruin looms for your clients and their dependent families.

In consideration of all of this, it becomes most apparent that adequate disability insurance for income replacement should be the cornerstone of any sound financial plan for every working American. Disability insurance is fundamental and must be prescribed in sufficient amounts as often as life or medical insurance. And you, the broker and trusted advisor, must promote it. Sell it. Because DI doesn’t sell itself. But how much DI is sufficient? Financial experts agree that 65 percent of monthly income replacement is the absolute minimum level needed to maintain some semblance of one’s pre-disability lifestyle in case of total disablement.

But a single disability income policy is not going cut it. You would be hard pressed to provide your clients with enough protection from one disability policy because insurance companies want it that way. Carriers regularly practice reverse discrimination when it comes to income protection. The more income you earn, the lower the percentage level of income protection is allowed by insurance companies. Their methods of shunning risk accumulation keep higher income earners from being sufficiently insured. Traditional DI companies view higher benefits as compelling incentives for insured persons to unnecessarily and prematurely go out on claim. High-limit disability benefits make most carriers uneasy. However, the industry has solutions to this egregious problem through a tiered approach of layering multiple, comprehensive disability plans, through different carriers, from different sectors of the market, one on top of another to achieve a desired income replacement level.

Many working professionals are provided employer-sponsored or employer-paid guaranteed-issue, group long-term disability benefits which usually have modest benefit caps that provide employees with common benefit levels up to 40 to 60 percent of income. Group benefits like that, on a fiduciary level, prove to be mostly sufficient for many working Americans. But the usual policy caps of $7,500 to $20,000 per month hardly allow for enough protection for higher income earners which is where we regularly witness the discrimination.

The next option is a layer of individual, fully-underwritten disability insurance. IDI is the mainstay of the industry and is marketed by numerous life and health carriers. The available benefits and riders are robust and long-term in nature, but again, we find excessive limitations when considering high-net worth clientele. Those making in excess of $300,000 annually will still find it difficult to reach that 65 percent income replacement figure when dealing with only one or two traditional layers of disability insurance.

The ultimate tool in replacing one’s income is high-limit or excess disability coverage. The third tier of income indemnification can be found in the secondary or Surplus Lines market which harbors specialty carriers like Lloyd’s of London and their marketplace of high-limit DI experts where extraordinary earnings can be appropriately insured to levels of at least 65 percent of income replacement.

Another strategy of layering multiple policies for higher levels of disability benefits can be found among the recently expanded guaranteed-issue or GSI market offerings. GSI coverage is in the “spotlight” at the moment, and is being touted by both domestic and specialty-market carriers, commonly replacing IDI and high-limit excess layers. The GSI product lines are very attractive to consumers, employers, and human resource managers, as well as insurance professionals.

As the product name suggests, these multi-life policies are guaranteed-issue, requiring no time consuming, physically intrusive exams, blood draws or urine samplings, allowing employees to sign-up electronically or with simple enrollment forms. The ease of enrollment is beneficial to all parties involved and gives employers the clout of providing added benefits, promoting employee contentment and retention. Furthermore, the price is certainly right to GSI program sponsors as the products usually call for substantial group or multi-life premium discounts.

In terms of marketing, GSI product platforms lend themselves nicely to coveted groups commonly targeted by brokers such as law firms, accounting agencies, hospitals, surgery centers and other large corporate entities. And much to the pleasure of the brokers landing this type of business, the commissions are significant and the business tends to stay on the books for many years.

The GSI market continues to be very lucrative and recently has become the focus of many in the business. However, a very important income replacement strategy that is often overlooked by many insurance agents deals with the use of personal DI benefits to address business risks. This is a serious conundrum that, unbeknownst to many, has plagued the disability insurance industry for many decades.

Business owners often face more responsibility and risk than their employees. In addition to protecting personal assets and their own livelihoods, owners are also tasked with maintaining business entities that they and their employees count on. The running and growth of those business entities naturally create a number of liabilities that require financial protection through disability insurance.

Unfortunately, it is a common occurrence for owners to assign their personal disability income benefits to indemnify business risk that can be better solved using ancillary DI products such as business overhead expense (BOE) coverage, buy/sell insurance, key person coverage or loan indemnification. The underuse of the latter is the most common folly.

The lending of capital by the Small Business Administration and other commercial and private financial institutions is a routine aspect of business development and company growth in the U.S. Most lenders require disability insurance policies as collateral to help indemnify risk to secure business loans. If you have never applied for a business loan before and are not sure which one to get, you can read more about how to whittle down to the one you need by going on over to kayescastleton.com. Because they are misinformed and/or striving to be frugal, borrowers frequently assign personal DI benefits or their existing BOE policies to secure needed loans. This creates the terrible problem that, in time of disablement, the borrower would stand to lose important income replacement for the protection of their families or benefits specifically earmarked for business continuation while they are out on disability. Small businesses can check to see if they are eligible for a USDA business loan in relation to this, by checking for usda approved towns and building their plan from there.

The sacrifice of personal DI benefits to cover business risks or the sacrifice of BOE benefits to cover loan requirements should not be advised or tolerated. There are ample solutions in the market to address these scenarios. There are product lines designed to address these concerns such as business loan indemnification insurance as well as contract guarantee insurance. Both are available as separate resources to usual business disability insurances, and available benefits can be manipulated to cover specific contractual needs of business owners. This is why when applying for a loan, a loan comparison website can be very helpful to those who don’t know which road to go down and want to get the best loan, without the worry.

Income replacement through disability insurance gives back financial freedoms that are commonly stolen by disabling accidents and illnesses. The discussed advanced strategies will assist you in providing your clients with the most sincere protection of their greatest asset-their income.

A Glimpse Into DI Financial Underwriting

0

As an insurance and financial services professional, you have probably submitted hundreds of applications on behalf of your clientele to any number of insurance carriers. You know the ropes and the usual drill. You know what insurance companies are looking for, which companies may be more lenient on persons with certain health issues or those companies that can be heavy-handed with their background checks or phone interviews. And over the years you have learned, perhaps by trial and error, how best to present a risk to an insurer, putting your client’s best foot forward so he or she can successfully attain that important financial protection they usually so rightly deserve. This is especially true with regards to disability insurance.

Your role as a broker or insurance agent is imperative to reading between the lines and addressing certain criteria as to which attributes disability underwriters will favor in a prospective risk and which “red flags” will hinder or halt progress to policy approval. But once underwriting requirements have been fully submitted for review to the insurance company, your influence in the transaction is placed on hold until an underwriting decision is finalized by the company.

So once that application is submitted and out of your hands, what happens behind the scenes and what factors into the ultimate decision-making by the insurance company to either accept or decline a case, leaving your client’s fate in the realm of the relatively unknown?

Similar to life insurance, disability risk analysis is separated into two general objectives: Health underwriting and financial underwriting. A DI underwriter must wear different hats throughout the processing of an insurance application, thinking sometimes as a medical professional and sometimes as an accountant. Our focus here is on the financial underwriting of disability insurance and how the nuances impact the intricate balance of doing what’s best for the paying client and doing what’s best for the insurance company’s bottom line allowing both parties to be mutually content with the outcome.

An underwriter is a person employed by an insurance company as an evaluator of risk. Most disability financial underwriters are certified public accountants or at the very least have strong backgrounds in accounting. Expertise in the position isn’t automatic and can take years to develop as they analyze risk after risk, case after case, while heading toward a common goal of reasonable financial protection of the carrier while providing marketable income-protection benefit programs to consumers.

Financial underwriting methodologies can differ among product lines. Regarding personal disability insurance, underwriters tend to maintain the insured person as their focus in terms of fiduciary needs and over-insurance concerns. Requested benefit amounts are commonly reduced to save the client from overpaying for benefit levels that wouldn’t come to fruition during a claim because of the client’s relatively lower annual income. However, reconsideration of benefits are available once an applicant’s financial situation has improved.

The first step in consideration of the financial insurability of an applicant is the thorough review of the application itself and the financial summary provided by the applicant. In some cases, additional information and proof of insurability is needed—like two consecutive years of recent personal federal and state income tax returns. Benefit eligibility is measured upon a percentage of net earned non-passive income set by the insurance company. Domestic DI carriers penalize applicants for having passive “unearned” income such as rental property or investment proceeds. Specialty-market carriers like Lloyd’s of London oftentimes ignore passive income without reduction of available benefits. If the applicant’s current work year is showing more positive signs in terms of higher income levels compared to previous tax years, financial underwriters will review employment pay stubs, fully-executed employment agreements and sometimes corporate financial statements in the sincere attempt to prove financial insurability among clients whose taxable earned incomes aren’t measuring up to their requested benefit amounts.

Regarding maximum benefit limitations and participation caps, there are differing ideologies when it comes to domestic carrier underwriters and specialty-market underwriters. Domestic carriers usually stick to a strict benefit level of 50 to 60 percent of income with usual monthly benefit caps anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000 depending on the applicant’s age, occupation and income level. Specialty-market carriers are more liberal and flexible in their offerings, allowing benefit levels of 65 to 75 percent with no monthly benefit caps often regardless of age, occupation or income level.

During the financial underwriting process of DI policies, common situations arise that can become suspicious and quite concerning to underwriters. An applicant’s earnings history can show significant income fluctuations and volatility in employment confidence. Spousal business partnerships as well as those who are newly self-employed are cause for concern because income splits may become convoluted to the evaluator, requiring additional investigation. Business owners showing unwavering earnings in industries ripe with historical earnings fluctuations are also of concern, as are persons with multiple sources of income from multiple occupations.

Circumstances may arise in the underwriting process that commonly call for a reduction of available benefit or even the ultimate declination of coverage. Applicants who report gross revenues instead of net income are of concern as well as those that include passive real estate income in their earnings when they are not considered real estate professionals. Another “red flag” is the inclusion of distributions from an S-Corp in personal income instead of non-passive taxable earnings as reported on a K-1 schedule for a given tax year. Also, applicants commonly leave out details of in-force disability insurance policies through other carriers as well as failing to indicate whether said coverage is employer-paid and/or taxable to the insured person. On the contrary, underwriters will seek to advise applicants if their eligibility for higher benefits exceeds the benefit level for which they applied.

Regarding the financial underwriting of business disability insurance, underwriters tend to maintain the applying corporation as their focus in terms of fiduciary needs and over-insurance concerns. Underwriters assume a business owner knows his or her business needs better than the insurance company, and employ supplemental questionnaires to evaluate risk for the underwriting of key person, business overhead and buy/sell insurance policies. The financial underwriting is fairly straightforward as opposed to underwriting personal benefits.

Key person DI underwriting uses a simple multiple of personal annual income as a beginning measurement for financial justification of the benefit. Underwriters will take other factors into consideration in their analysis such as potential fiduciary loss to the company, potential loss of current and future accounts, corporate ownership value of the insured person as well as perceived value of the key person to the company.

Business overhead expense underwriting requires the applicant to provide a detailed listing of average monthly expenses including mortgage payments, utility bills, insurance premiums, accounting services, maintenance costs and certain employee salary expenses.

Buy/sell DI underwriting requires an accurate outline of corporate structure as well as an executed buy/sell agreement and corporate tax returns.

Financial underwriters understand that business arrangements come in all shapes and sizes and no two cases are exactly the same. The same can be said for any disability policy. If the numbers don’t add-up, an insurance company won’t be willing to financially back a precarious risk. Disability financial underwriting isn’t always black and white. It takes interpretation and finesse. It’s more than dollars and cents, more than numbers and percentages, it’s a learned, delicate art of balancing risk and reward.

On To The Next Chapter

0

For years, this column has been a devotion and a sincere reflection of the passion for disability insurance held by the great W. Harold Petersen.  I know Harold has deeply enjoyed his tenure, sharing his unfathomable knowledge and remarkable insights to the relatively misunderstood and often overlooked world of disability income protection.  A true pioneer of the industry, he has relentlessly continued for many decades to promote DI in all its wonderful facets and teach new producers and their clients about the altruistic attributes of the market and the distinct importance of insuring one’s greatest asset, his or her ability to earn an income.

At the seasoned age of 89 years old, Harold Petersen has made the difficult decision to pass-on the writing of this column in order to spend more time with his darling wife Jacquie and their many children, grandchildren and great grandchildren.  He remains Chairman of the Board of Petersen International Underwriters, but intends to spend some time away from the office pursuing other personal interests.

Harold is very appreciative of Stephen Howard and of Broker World magazine, and he knows the column will be in good hands going forward as very qualified and competent authors will provide expert insight in the months to come.

As we move on to a new chapter, it would be a grave mistake to lament and dwell on the past and not look forward to the future of this business.  Harold Petersen has been a mentor of mine for many years, and he taught me to embrace history and learn from the missteps and successes of yesterday, but always be looking forward.  Always be scheming, thinking and creating that next evolution in the DI business.  Progress only occurs when you take a chance.

As we are all aware, technology plays a big hand in all aspects of modern life in this country and that is especially true of the financial world.  In most insurance markets, we are seeing big business running globally with digital resources and continuously-improving automation.  Many insurance lines are now capable of transacting business instantly with program platforms that quote, process applications, underwrite, accept payment and issue and deliver comprehensive insurance policies immediately by electronic means.  Systems are becoming smarter and more user friendly by the day.

These industry advances are also taking hold in marketing and sales divisions, which in turn is allowing insurance companies to directly target clients of any demographic without the finesse and expertise of licensed insurance professionals.  Fortunately for most of us, the DI market is somewhat of a different animal than its life and health cousins.

A spot-on adage that Harold Petersen reminded me of frequently in my early days in the business is that disability insurance doesn’t sell itself.  Brokers and agents are the true heroes of the industry and are instrumental in its success.  For it takes a seasoned advisor to, first, sell a prospective client on the fact that they are not impervious to illness or injury and, second, easily relate the sometimes complicated nuances of the proper DI policy.  Some tech-savvy carriers and brokerage outfits have created online DI sales platforms for coverage with significant benefit and term limitations, but ultimately, the results have been mediocre at best.  Only time will tell if a robust income protection product can flourish and be triumphantly marketed and sold without the guidance of a live insurance professional.  In the meantime, the DI market’s best friend is still the learned and patient insurance agent.

As a result of advances in automation and claims administration, DI carriers are showing more proven success in marketing disability programs to the middle markets as well as lower income clientele.  More Americans are being offered income protection than ever before, and, as market competition drives premiums lower, the industry has greatly benefited from a huge influx of new premium dollars.  But there continues to be immense growth in the upper markets as well.  

Where we are witnessing substantial growth and the most excitement in the market as of late is in the rapidly expanding “multi-life” simplified-issue business.  Both domestic and specialty-market international carriers have embraced DI programs that employ simplified or even guaranteed-issue underwriting on groups with as few as three insured professionals.  This type of insurance platform is quite alluring to prospects as there are usually no requirements of lengthy paper applications nor intrusive paramedical exams and lab tests.  Furthermore, agents are finding it easier to get a foot in the doors of prospective corporate clientele because a program like this carries substantial group discounts that bode well for HR managers and company budget bottom lines.  

These simplified-issue programs have blurred traditional market-sector boundaries and are being successfully sold by individual DI producers as well as the expected group DI producers and employee benefits producers.  And that is the genius behind it all.  These policies have found attraction along many lines and provide market-entry points to multiple financial specialist categories.  No longer are individual DI producers left out of the multi-life action.  I have seen an agent turn a single attorney DI sale into a multi-million-dollar guaranteed-issue sale on the attorney’s entire law firm; it’s not a rare occurrence either.  The multi-life market is red hot, and it is the present and foreseeable future of this industry. 

Whether it be new technology, simplified sales platforms or new insurance products, the current state of the income protection market is vigorous and progressive.  The unknown of the disability industry is nothing to fear, so let’s continue on to the next chapter.

Having Some DI Is Not Having Enough DI

0

When considering personal insurance lines, “more” is almost always better.  More coverage means more financial protection against the bodily threats and risks that inevitably come with life.  When you prescribe your clients medical insurance, you dutifully advise them to have a comprehensive policy that fits into their budget but covers them as completely as possible.  When you prescribe your clients life insurance you take the same stance, finding them as much appropriate coverage as they can afford to allow for financial protection of the family as well as estate planning.  But when it comes to disability income insurance, mistakenly, the same approach isn’t always followed.

Many millions of Americans work for a living, earning a regular paycheck that provides for the necessities of life (food, shelter, clothing, transportation, insurance premiums, education, etc.) for themselves and their families, but most lack sufficient income protection.  It’s inherently natural to disbelieve in one’s own morbidity and physical demise, yet statistics show that a healthy person is at least three times more susceptible to disablement from accident or sickness than to death during their career. Disability insurance is quite often overlooked or simply an afterthought—and that needs to change in this country.

Much of the U.S. workforce that is covered by some form of disability insurance is under the impression that employer-sponsored benefits are sufficient to their insurance needs and individual income protection plans aren’t necessary.  For many Americans, of modest levels of income, that is true.  A group long term DI program provides minimal, but enough insurance protection to most industries and occupations.  But what about those that make more money than the average American? 

Consider an executive making $300,000 per year.  Is a group LTD plan, providing 60 percent of income up to $10,000 per month, going to allow enough protection to maintain that person’s lifestyle or the lifestyles of their spouse and children?  Families with a high net worth require more insurance than most, as their average expense ratio is significantly higher than an average household.

It is clearly an agent best practice to prescribe a prospective client with as much disability insurance as they can get their hands on.  In addition to group coverage, domestic carriers offer small layers of individual insurance.  But for anyone in this country making over $250,000 annually, supplemental or excess high-limit DI is a must to bring income protection levels up to more appropriate ranges from 65 to 75 percent of income.  Those are the magic numbers.

The U.S. Department of Labor and DI experts throughout the country have maintained for decades that a working American should have at least 65 percent of his/her income insured in the hopes of providing for one’s family during a period of total disablement.  Some high-limit DI carriers, in certain cases, are now participating with coverage up to 75 percent of one’s income, if any in-force benefits happen to be taxable, to better allow for more substantial income protection.

Make it an integral part of your repertoire to teach your clients that, in addition to life and health insurances, disability income protection is a necessity and having less than 65 percent of their income insured just isn’t going to cut it.  Insurance is all about preparation for the unknown and planning for the worst case scenario.  A vast majority of Americans, even the wealthy, fail to maintain significant savings and liquid assets in cases of emergencies like unforeseen disablement.  Retirement programs are certainly gaining in popularity and more people in this country are planning for their futures after retirement, but they are severely lacking in protection for the here and now during their working careers.

And after you have convinced them of the fundamental importance of disability insurance, you must make those additional efforts to show them that some DI just isn’t enough DI.  Underinsurance provides a false sense of security for which you don’t want to be responsible.  As an advisor you owe it to your clientele to get them appropriately insured to high-limit DI levels so they can economically care for themselves and their families if they were to suffer a short or long term impairment.  You are not selling them just another redundant piece of paper.  You are providing them with financial freedom from potential disaster.

But after you have exhausted group LTD and domestic individual insurance sources, where else can you turn if your clients can’t acquire coverage traditionally either due to a health or occupation concern or due to a benefit participation limit issue?  U.S. carriers won’t allow for the participation limits that your high net worth clients need, but the Surplus Lines market including companies like Lloyd’s of London will.  The “secondary” or specialty markets hold the unique ability to be more flexible and accommodating to clients with more to risk than most.

These markets have been participants in U.S.-based risk for almost forty years, and their products and offerings have thoughtfully evolved into the best accompaniment to American disability coverage.  Long term “own-occupation” benefits with generous payment schedules including monthly and lump sum payouts are available to clients needing more than what U.S. carriers are willing to offer.

The right tools are at your disposal.  Use them.  Revisit clients you have assisted in the past.  Be relentless.  Pound it into their brains that disability insurance indemnifies their greatest asset—their income.  Without their ability to work and earn a fair living their lives will be irrevocably changed, and income protection insurance is the safeguard.  Further, stress that being underinsured is risky and more dangerous than anticipated.  It is in your clients’ best interests and your due diligence to prescribe income protection of at least 65 percent of one’s adjusted gross income.  With sincerity and guidance, your clients and their families will be properly protected from the financial roadblocks life sends their way. 

Niche Product Marketing

0

The personal lines, corporate and employee benefits insurance industries are chock-full of products and programs with which many of you are very familiar and probably make your living selling on a daily basis.  Most non-property and non-casualty insurances fall under the usual categories of life, health, annuities, disability, travel and long term care.  And most brokers and agents will tend to gravitate toward one or two of those specialties, but may dabble from time to time in the others.  Among those main risk divisions, one can find many niche sub-groupings of insurance products that are extremely useful to the consumer and can be very profitable to the producer when one knows how and why to properly market and prescribe them.

Although commonly considered inferior as outliers to rank-and-file brokers, those with “bigger picture” vision easily recognize that niche products serve a masterful purpose in the greater market.  Most were designed to complement or fill coverage gaps in more mainstream product lines.  They are used to supplement or even replace what can’t be found or acquired through the “traditional” insurance marketplaces, and they answer a serious need in this country.  

It is true that niche products should rarely be a primary consideration for the basic coverage needs of your clientele, as the policies tend to be less robust in term length and hold more renewability limitations than standard insurances.  But, when an obvious solution isn’t readily available or when additional coverage is needed but not allowed or at least heavily limited by your usual carriers, niche product lines can ultimately serve your clients very well and succinctly fill in the glaringly dangerous holes in their life and health benefits.

The products in question are seldom found through “usual” insurance channels.  Most are administered through the surplus lines market in the U.S. from European carriers and large, established international insurance organizations like Lloyd’s of London.  In the life/health industry, niche products began their slow and steady introduction into American circles almost a half-century ago, but the need for higher insurance limits in the physician and surgeon disability market of the 1980’s coaxed an onslaught of niche product development and refinement that has continued over the last 30 years.  Interestingly and probably expected, the most recent of product surges have been an immediate result of the implementation of the Obama administration’s healthcare reform and the changes in regulation interpretation that has taken place over the last several years. 

So the questions arise: Why make the effort in your business to market niche product lines?  Why do your clients need these insurances that your domestic carriers don’t provide?  The simple answer is that your clients are human beings, and nature and desire have made them fallible.  Not everyone fits the pretentious mold set out by standard carrier underwriting and actuarial departments.  I can bet that, at one time or another, you have come across a prospect that is too fat, too old, has too many health issues, makes too much money, makes too little money, works overseas, skydives too frequently or did cocaine the weekend before an insurance exam.  I expect that you can identify with having to deal with some of those underwriting issues among your clientele, and I see those issues day in and day out.  Millions of Americans, your prospects, face these common insurance roadblocks, and prejudicial companies keep them from purchasing the financial protection they need.  And for that reason, the specialty, niche product markets exist and flourish to this day. 

Your first step as an interested and dutiful insurance broker is to identify potential prospects for niche products.  That part is easy.  Any client that you have gotten quotes for or taken through underwriting that has been declined by an insurance company for basic or supplemental personal or corporate insurance of any kind is a ripe and ready candidate for a niche product.  Those who are underinsured in life or disability coverage as well as those who have missed ACA major medical or Medicare enrollment windows are all perfect prospects.  In the specialty markets, you will be able to find niche products for most lines including life, medical and disability cases.

So now you are finding solutions for cases you thought were “dead in the water” so to speak.  The niche market will make you a hero and won’t send you back to your clients empty handed, even if your clients work on oil rigs, have severe depression, play professional basketball or have multiple sclerosis.  The niche product market is the “yes man” in a room full of suspicious naysayers.  It’s a very exciting aspect of the insurance industry, and can make you a fortune while helping your clients.

No matter how hard you work, no matter how many hours you put into a case, a declination of coverage doesn’t pay a commission.  Niche products do provide commissions that, although modest on the front end, tend to be significant over a period of renewals, outperforming traditional group benefit commission schedules.  You can also double-up on compensation when prescribing supplemental policies on top of fully-underwritten baseline coverage–two commissions while piggybacking the underwriting requirements of two carriers, simplifying the policy issuance and lessening your work.  It’s a win-win situation.

Now let’s talk specifics.  Excess or high-limit disability insurance is a prime example of what the niche markets have to offer.  If you have a client making in excess of $300,000 annually, you know that you will be hard-pressed to find a carrier willing to insure at least 65 percent of that client’s income.  The niche market is your answer and will be able to provide a supplemental layer of “own-occupation” high-limit disability coverage on top of existing individual or group long term disability insurance. 

For your clients that have been declined by the disability market for their hazardous occupation, substandard health history, age or their preferences for a dangerous avocation, there are ample sources for impaired risk disability underwriting.  Niche product companies have the unique ability to employ more lenient underwriting guidelines than the standard market, allowing your hard-to-place clients to acquire comprehensive income replacement insurance when your standard carriers say “no.”

Regarding the heavy-handed healthcare overhaul by the Affordable Care Act, the market has been forced to deal with great change which has required quick and substantial adaptation to remain profitable.  Many marquee health insurance carriers have chosen to pull out of individual exchanges in states all over the country, ultimately leaving big cracks that Americans are falling through without the ability to secure coverage for periods of time.  The niche market has answered with short term medical plans that are successfully plugging many of the enrollment holes found in the healthcare field at this time. 

Other health care needs that the ACA doesn’t address like travel insurance have always been a staple of the niche product market.  International travel medical policies provide those working in or visiting other countries with comprehensive major medical care anywhere in the world.  They also provide robust ancillary benefits like trip cancellation reimbursement and emergency evacuation services back to the United States.

Life insurance is also represented in the non-traditional market with products like term life insurance for Americans living outside the U.S.  Also, a newer line of life products that has taken the market by storm is contingent life insurance, more commonly known as Failure to Survive or Contract protection.  This product provides a simplified-issue, quickly underwritten death benefit to indemnify short term business contracts including loans and buy/sell agreements.  And like its niche market disability counterparts, the underwriting guidelines are more forgiving than those of U.S. life carriers. 

Along the life insurance lines, war and terrorism insurance has remained important to Americans since 2001.  Built upon an accidental death and dismemberment chassis, war and terrorism coverage provides high-limit benefits to U.S. residents living, traveling or working anywhere in the world.  The best prospects include government contractors, missionaries, international business persons and tourists.   

The aforementioned insurance products are just a glimpse of the worthwhile and exciting options available to your clients.  You may not see a need for them every day, but I can guarantee you that the traditional U.S. insurance market is not always going to be able to assist every one of your clients every time they need insurance.  The need for niche products is completely evident, and the secret to success in niche product marketing is to be prolific.  Provide solutions to problems your clients didn’t think of previously.  

Look to the outlying markets frequently and not only when you hit one of those roadblocks.  If you have a client wanting personal life insurance, also show them a supplemental AD&D policy with war and terrorism coverage.  If you have an individual disability client, make sure to provide a quote for excess personal coverage as well as key person insurance to help protect his business.

There are so many tools out there and they are all designed to help protect your clients’ families, their businesses and their financial well being.  Don’t approach as a salesperson, approach as an advisor and perhaps even as a friend because you are providing more than a service for compensation, you are providing them with safety.  Niche products have become more established and are regularly addressing the everyday insurance needs of all Americans.  It will behoove you to think outside the box and look beyond the traditional insurance marketplaces.

The Cannabis Effect On Life And Disability Markets

0

The leaves and buds of the marijuana plant have been cultivated and used by humans as medicine and as a euphoria-inducing agent since ancient times. Its earliest references date back to China in the early third millennium B.C. where it was used to treat gout and rheumatism. Cannabis later made its way to India and then to North Africa where it was popularized as a recreational drug in lieu of alcohol which was banned by traditional Muslim teachings. By 500 A.D. it had landed in Europe.

Spanish explorers brought marijuana to the New World in 1545, but it wasnt introduced to the English colonies until 1611 in Jamestown where cannabis became a major commercial crop for farmers as a reliable source of fiber. Eventually the marketability of cotton and tobacco spread throughout the southern states and replaced the marijuana harvest in the U.S. Pot use dwindled in this country until the twentieth century.

According to many historians, the post-World War I Jazz Era as well as Prohibition led many Americans to turn to the recreational use of marijuana, creating a burgeoning demand. Meanwhile, government research, political posturing and increased legislation heralded by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics culminated in a nationwide crackdown on pot. Cannabis was tagged the gateway drug to narcotics addiction, and its use became widely illegal.

Ever since Reefer Madness was released in the 1930s, through the counterculture era of the 1960s, to the beginning of this century, the American majority remained at war with weed. Marijuana has historically been persecuted similarly to harder illegal drugs by state and national legislatures and law enforcement, creating moral hazards that are just now being addressed with the changing views on pot cultivation, distribution and use. Even though it remains illegal on a national level, recent legislation among many states in the union has greatly eased the societal stigmas associated with the use of pot and the taxation and revenue generation of the marijuana industry.

Cannabis use for medicinal purposes is now legal in 28 states as well as Washington, D.C. Recreational use of marijuana is now legal in seven states as well as Washington, D.C., and after elections last November, several more states will soon be added to both of those lists. It is also now legal to grow between 3 and 12 cannabis plants at your home, depending on what state you reside in. This is possible by trying weed-seeds.ca and purchasing some seeds. Encompassing multiple generations, America has grown more agreeable in its attitude toward herbal intoxicants in the last 15 years.

That fact has carried over into the insurance industry, specifically the life and health markets. Disability underwriters and life underwriters have become more accustomed to seeing applicants who smoke marijuana or use pot-laced products on a regular basis. In the past, these prospects would have been automatically declined by most life insurance and disability insurance companies. But underwriting methodologies have liberalized to a far greater extent in the past few years, and habitual pot users are generally classified and rated similarly to tobacco users. Preferred life insurance rates for someone that frequently uses marijuana can be four times more expensive than preferred life insurance rates for someone that doesnt partake in pot or tobacco at all. The disability income protection rates of most U.S. carriers reflect a similar pattern, but to a lesser extent.

Many industry leaders have additionally begun analyzing the pot risk on a scale of use. For example, a person who smokes pot less than once per week may receive a lower rating than a person who smokes pot every day. In many instances, those who are occasional users qualify under cheaper non-smoker rates. Insurance companies have also begun classifying risk differently for those that smoke marijuana versus those that ingest edible products that contain cannabis.

As insurance companies and their discerning on-staff medical directors become more accustomed to insuring cannabis users, and as the marijuana industry itself expands, the life and health markets will most likely see further increases in underwriting liberalization as the two industries further feel each other out and learn to profitably coexist.

Although the physiological and psychological effects of long-term use are still widely debated, most Americans who use marijuana can now find sufficient levels of income and asset protection from disability and life carriers in the United States.

Yet, finding appropriate business insurance for the marijuana industry itself remains a substantial challenge for insurance agents and financial advisors. Millions of dollars in capital are being raised all over the country by interested investors looking for big returns on start-up growing and distribution businesses, who are in themselves turning to companies who specialize in seed to sale software to help them maximize their profits, and those investors are wanting to hedge their bets in the fledgling industry with large amounts of life and disability insurances.Other kinds of production, such as Private Labeling CBD Products, are also becoming more and more prominent in the industry, which in turn is opening up many opportunities for many Americans. Unfortunately, the traditional American markets won’t yet entertain corporate insurance for pot businesses or personal insurance for those working in those businesses. They commonly report that the moral risks are still too high for comfort. However, the international marketplaces and the surplus lines carriers seem to be more receptive to those prospects.

Insurance syndicates at Lloyds of London are writing personal disability and accident insurances on those working in or running cannabis companies, including growers, wholesalers, and retailers. Most policies do exclude claims arising from drug abuse/misuse including the taking of marijuana. But those generally-progressive overseas underwriters too have shied away from providing financial protection for the cannabis businesses themselves.

Yet, business insurance solutions do exist for the corporate pot world. There are a few sources in the greater London market that have already adopted a more receptive attitude, and see a fast-approaching legal, regulated and flourishing future for the marijuana industry in America. They are willing to write contingent death benefits for key person, loan indemnification and buy/sell insurances on the lives of the owners and operators of the multi-million dollar distribution companies and grow operations popping-up throughout the U.S. They are also beginning to entertain offering business disability insurances for the marijuana industry.

With regards to the blossoming cannabis industry, the most glaring roadblock to their insurance needs is that the use and cultivation of pot is still illegal, in various forms, among many states and in the eyes of the federal government. But considering ongoing media coverage and the obvious changes in ideals of the voting public, it is apparent that Pandoras Box has been opened and the tide of legalization is steadily sweeping across a country with more permissive views towards pot than ever before.

As the marijuana industry in the United States continues to set its foundations, will domestic insurance carriers and regulators also find a profitable and stabilized future in serving the cannabis market? Only time will tell, but that is where our insurance and financial markets are headed.

The Nuances Of Specialty-Risk Underwriting

0

The practice of underwriting insurance is a fine mixture of art and science.  To be successful, it takes a lot of common sense, even more experience and a well-rounded team of experts.  Time and practice are the true keys to the profitable underwriting of life, health and disability insurances.  As you can probably imagine, factors such as age, gender, occupation risk, financial viability and adverse health history play significant roles in the underwriting of most insurance.  But other, less obvious factors come into play when working in the specialty-risk side of the life and health marketplace.

Unlike the textbook-like, rigid foundations of “traditional” life/health underwriting, the specialty market is much more flexible and fluid.  Most of the participating carriers are found in the European markets that historically follow property and casualty platforms and are accustomed to shorter terms of insurance and shorter windows of risk than what we traditionally find with U.S. companies.  While the underwriting methods of American insurers closely follow a scale of black and white, the shorter-term policies coming out of carriers like Lloyd’s of London fall more frequently into shades of grey.  Their underwriting methodologies and their ability to more readily adjust rates and coverage terms and conditions allow them to profitably take risks that U.S. companies wouldn’t normally touch—many times successfully finding square pegs that will fit into round holes.

While acknowledging such flexibility, specialty-market underwriting faces a number of curious obstacles and challenges that are specific to the plentiful and diverse product lines available through companies like Lloyd’s. 

Life and accident insurances become very interesting to underwrite when a proposed insured is traveling or living overseas.  Risk analysis becomes even more complicated when the client is a private security guard, journalist, missionary or government contractor stationed in areas like Northern Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan.   Most of the available products include war and terrorism benefits, making the attention to political risk very important.

U.S. State Department warnings and alerts as well as a thorough daily canvassing of world news reports provide the due diligence in the underwriting of international insurances which provide death benefits.  Considering the recent socio-economic and political climates of the world, risk analysis has evolved over the last couple of decades and has become quite sophisticated.  Underwriters not only consider rate-loading per individual countries, but more specifically for certain cities or territories within those countries.

For example, the Bujumbura Province of the nation of Burundi is considered a high risk locale, but from an underwriting standpoint, most of the rest of the country is at a tolerable, low risk level.  The differences in risk levels translate to considerable price fluctuations.  A typical “flat extra” for the nation of Burundi is less than one dollar per thousand of benefit while the loading for that rural province of Bujumbura would require five dollars per thousand of benefit.  Location of risk weighs heavily on the basic underwriting concepts and the eventual prices of international life and accident policies.

Another specialty product that is dictated, perhaps even more infamously, by location of risk is Kidnap and Ransom (K&R) insurance.  The K&R centers of risk exposure happen to mostly overlap with the life/accident side, but have additional epicenters of concern in Mexico, Central America and South America.

Kidnappings for ransom have become a worldwide epidemic of great revenue sourcing for petty criminals and more organized syndicates including terrorist factions and drug cartels.  Thousands of Americans, Australians and Europeans are detained against their will every year throughout the world.  Targeted victims range from traveling executives to tourists to journalists to industrial workers, and the ransom demands vary as equally.  Express kidnappings, common to Brazil, are quick and usually non-violent hijackings that end with an ATM payout of cash.  At the other end of the spectrum are long, violent, drawn-out detentions for political and/or financial gain that can last years and usually end with the death of the victim or with a payout that can reach millions of dollars.  Long-term kidnappings are associated with many countries in Africa and the Middle East, as well as Mexico, Venezuela and the Philippines.

The underwriting of K&R policies focuses on the planned business and personal travel itineraries of clients.  In addition to risk location, underwriters analyze specific travel routes and modes of transport within a hazardous country.  Employed security measures and previous threat history are also important in the calculation of K&R risk.  Persons traveling with a personal or corporate-sponsored private security detail are usually considered at lesser risk than those being guarded by local police, foreign military or those without any protection.

Unlike the travel oriented focus of the K&R market, specialty-risk disability insurance tends to require serious focus on mental and physical health risk.  High-limit disability insurance is a sector of the personal accident market that notably requires the most adept underwriting skills among the entire accident and health insurance industry.  Disability insurance in itself requires superior underwriting talent to gauge a relative unknown—the probability, over a period of time, of an employed person to lose, by accident or sickness, his ability to physically earn an income. 

The sedentary, fast-food lifestyles of Americans have led to more impaired risk disability cases than ever before.  Underwriters are being faced with a daily barrage of medically-challenged prospects.  Type II diabetes, coronary artery disease, morbid obesity, high blood pressure and sleep apnea have become commonplace among those seeking disability insurance and underwriters are having to rely more heavily on their medical directors to find a comfortable balance between benefits and pricing.  The costs of underwriting medically-substandard disability insurance are soaring.

Health history, age and build are of course major role players in every underwriter’s analysis of disability cases.  But occupation and daily work duties are additional significant variables in the specialty-risk arena.  Occupations like professional athlete, commercial diver, airline pilot and coal miner require more attention to work-related risk than would an executive.  

Financial insurability is also of great importance when underwriting disability policies as complications come in many forms.  Insurance is commonly needed for start-up companies without acceptable trails of financial documentation.  Underwriters also see individual disability applications from persons with bankruptcy histories and large amounts of business income versus personal earned income.  

In the world of specialty-risk disability, life and health insurance, underwriters are forced to wear many hats if they are to successfully and profitably indemnify the myriad of risk that is out there. 

International Benefits In The 21st Century

0

In today’s business world, long gone are the days of regionalism and local sourcing as companies of any size across many fields conduct business on a global scale.  Any business can expand to other countries by using translation services in Manchester, adapting to fit into the market in whatever country they grow into, and optimizing digital technology to their advantage. Almost every inch of the map has been filled-in and connected by electronic communication, providing immediate transfer of information and spanning vast distances instantly.  Contemporary technologies and conveniences like email and web-based conferencing have allowed for American-domiciled corporations to transact business anywhere in the world at any time of day.

Highly-educated specialist hires have become commonplace among big, medium and small business, no matter nationality or location of residence.  A successful firm’s reach is no longer limited to four walls in New York or Chicago, but to every nation on earth.  U.S. companies are now multinational, employing numerous staff traveling frequently or even residing outside of the United States.

In response to the rapid development of global economic expansion, the insurance industry has attempted to keep up since the end of the twentieth century.  Although sometimes slow to adapt and modernize, markets contributing to the personal accident and employee benefits sectors have developed successful marketing and underwriting platforms for American firms with international interests.

As traditional domestic life and health carriers tend to lack a substantial appetite for international risk, many solutions for multinational employers lay outside “usual” insurance channels.  The most relevant player in the international benefits market is centuries-old giant Lloyd’s of London, accompanied by other major insurers and reinsurers in the outlying London and European markets.  Several large domestic carriers also partake regularly in the group health arena, but the Lloyd’s market remains the go-to for niche international solutions, attempting to mirror the individual and group benefits of domestic counterparts while simultaneously adapting to the daily-changing political and economic climates of the rest of the world.

Most U.S. employers contractually guarantee benefits regardless of employee occupations, compensations, international travel schedules or overseas residences.  Unbeknownst to many of those employers, life insurance, disability insurance, medical insurance, accident insurance and other ancillary international benefits are difficult, if not impossible, to acquire through the domestic market.  Through international channels, however, group and individual benefits are readily available for American employers with risks based outside the United States.

International life insurance offerings are usually limited to term products for individuals and groups of U.S. citizens and/or employees of U.S.-domiciled companies living and working outside the United States and outside their home countries.  Policies are available on guaranteed-issue, simplified-issue and fully-underwritten chassis, but unlike the U.S. life market, policy wordings often don’t include contestability clauses or any limitations regarding international travel or residence.  The downside is that international policies usually have no convertibility and are limited to 10 year maximum terms with no permanent or variable life options.  But in many regards, U.S. life carriers are far behind foreign life companies who are in the business of providing true global benefits. 

Disability insurance for international risks is also limited to term products, but the benefit schedules can be very flexible with long monthly benefit periods and optional lump sum payouts.  Individually-underwritten policies as well as multi-life guaranteed-issue coverage are commonplace in the international benefits sector.  But unlike domestic insurance, international DI carriers don’t require claimants to return to the U.S. to receive benefits, and underwriting standards are far more lenient than those of domestic insurers.  

International major medical insurance is usually guaranteed-issue and available on a variety of chassis depending on the need and length of the policy required.  From tourist and travel policies to longer-term foreign residence healthcare, international medical insurance offers reimbursement benefits for accident and sickness as well as specialty riders for emergency evacuation, repatriation of remains, war, and terrorism, as well as hazardous sports/activities coverage.  Some carriers emphasize medical benefits while other plans are heavy on travel benefits. 

Accident insurance including accidental death/dismemberment (AD&D) and business travel accident (BTA) has become quite common for those working overseas, especially in war zones and other political hot spots when fully-underwritten life insurance isn’t a plausible short-term solution due to time sensitive underwriting logistics and the severity of risk location.

Other major concerns for those working and living abroad are kidnappings for ransom which have become a huge source of revenue for organized crime syndicates and terror groups in developing and third-world nations.  Policies available in the market provide ransom reimbursement as well the emergency assistance of experienced crisis response teams that employ negotiation specialists who are experts in gaining the safe return of a kidnapped employee.  Workers’ comp programs such as Defense Base Act (DBA) coverage are also popular as the insurance has become requisite of most civilians working overseas on government contracts.  

Requests for most international insurances come from the corporate world including human resource managers requiring benefits for employees working overseas.  But the need for international coverage is also common among small business owners, tourists, U.S. expats, government contractors as well as missionary and foreign-aid organizations.

As international business continues to expand and develop for American companies, the need for basic and essential risk indemnification evolves with the socioeconomic conditions found throughout the world.  The insurances available reflect those hazards and concerns that change on a daily basis.  The realm of international insurance has become as flexible and reactive as the world in which it serves.